cultural heritage varanasi logo
cultural heritage varanasi logo
About varanasi

Kashi Vishvanatha, the patron deity of City: Succession, Sustenance, and Sustainability.

Rana P.B. Singh & Pravin S. Rana
1. Succession

In the context of Hindus’ faith system, the image of Vishvanatha is infinite in time, as He directly represents the absolute form of Shiva who controls the cyclic rhythm of cosmos from existence in time past (succession), appearance in the time present (sustenance), and future ongoingness in the time future (sustainability). That’s how Shiva is called Kaleshvara (‘controller of time’), and Nataraja (‘cosmic dancer’), and Trilokinatha (‘Lord of the three realms’—the heaven, the earth, and the underworld); this is narrated in the Svetasvara Upanishad (6.6). 

Shiva and Kashi are considered to be inseparable, in fact they are the two visions of the same reality, i.e. subtle and invisible.  According to the story in the Vayu Purana (92.27-55), after marriage Shiva and Parvati wanted to settle at a vibrant place where the energy of Nature elements may be stronger, full with lush of greeneries and sacred groves. Thus, they decided to settle down in Kashi, which was ruled by Kind Divodas, who did not want Lord Shiva to enter his territory. Lord Shiva sent his Ganas (assistants), Yoginis (fierce demi-goddesses), Ganesha (his son), Surya (Sun-god), and his other associates, but they all failed in their mission, rather settled down here. Ultimately, Shiva himself went to King Divodasa and preached him ‘true knowledge’, thus he handed over Kashi to Shiva as his permanent resort, eulogised as ‘Ananda Vana’.  This story is vividly and elaborately described in several Puranas, especially the Brahmanda (2.3.67-68), Vayu (92), and Bhagavata (9.1.7).

The main incidences related to the Lord Vishvanatha’s appearance and the story of his temple is summarised in Table 8.1.

Table 8.1. Historical Incidence: Kashi Vishvanatha Mandir– Timeline in History

Scroll horizontally to view all fields on smaller screens

It is believed that the first temple of Avimukteshvara (later called Vishvanatha) was built around 6th century in the north-eastern part of the city, i.e. Rajghat, but in passage of time was completely deserted. It again came to light in early 7th century (2nd site) that continued till CE 1194. During her reign Bibi Razzia (1236-1240) had built a mosque on the deserted site of Vishvanatha temple, which had been earlier demolished by Aibak in ca 1194. This mosque erected over the dismantled Vishvanatha temple, shows an act that effectively “islamicised” a site particularly the most holy to the Hindus (Rötzer 2005, p. 53). 

By the end of the 13th century the Vishvanatha temple was re-built in the compound of ancient Avimukteshvara and existed till the next destruction (of course partial) under the rule of the Sharqi kings of Jaunpur (1436-1458). But in 1490 Sikandar Lodi completely demolished it. Only after a gap of about ninety years, in ca 1585-90 with the support of Todar Mala, one of the senior courtiers of Akbar, the great scholar and writer Narayana Bhatta (1514-1595) had re-built it again, most likely on the structural plan of the previous temple of the 13th century (cf. Singh 2009, p. 77).

2. Sustenance

Soon after becoming emperor, Mughal King Aurangzeb issued an order (farman) against proclaiming him as true propitiator of Islam on 9 April 1669. On that date, according to Ma’sîr-i-Ãlamgîrî, “The Emperor ordered the governors of all provinces to demolish the schools and temples of the infidels and strongly put down their teaching and religious practices” (cf. Sarkar 1928: 186). Aurangzeb’s Fatawâ-i-Ãlamgîrî truly mentions that the noblest occupation for Muslims is jihad (war against non-Muslims). This meant that military service provided the best career for a Muslim, and it was the business of the kings and commanders to declare every war a jihad. The practice of the military profession was made identical with the fulfilment of a religious duty [Fatawâ-i-Ãlamgîrî, Matba al-Kubra, Egypt, 1310 H., vol. V, pp. 346-48].  Saqi Mustaad Khan, the author of Ma’sîr-i-Ãlamgîrî writes: “His majesty, eager to establish Islam, issued orders to the governors of all the provinces (imperial farman dated April 9, 1669) to demolish the schools and temples of the infidels and put down with the utmost urgency the teaching and the public practice of the religion of these misbelievers.” Soon after “it was reported that in accord with the Emperor’s command, his officers had demolished the temple of Vishvanatha at Kashi” on 18 April 1669. This was the period when the Maratha chief Chhatrapati Shivaji took refuge for a few days in 1666 with the help of the local people in Banaras, after escaping from imprisonment in Agra. This fact is a proof of the people’s feelings against the government.  

This news further irritated Aurangzeb. Jadunath Sarkar has cited several sources regarding the subsequent destruction of temples which went on all over the country, and right up to January 1705, two years before Aurangzeb died (Sarkar 1928: 186-89). By this order once again around a thousand temples including the city’s greatest temples like Vishveshvara, Krittivasa and Vindu Madhava, were razed and their sites were forever sealed from Hindu access by the construction of mosques. 

The medieval temple of Vishvanatha stood near the bend of Chauk Road close to the mosque of Bibi Raziyya (r. 1236–1240), but nothing of it now survives. Bibi Raziyya’s mosque, occupying a central location in the ancient city, erected over the dismantled Vishvanatha temple, shows an act that effectively “islamicised” a site particularly holy to the Hindus. This mosque was built from previous materials, in particular pillars of an older Hindu temple, consists of two chambers connected by a three-arched opening; and four pillars in the middle of each chamber carry a set of lintels on which rest the slabs of the ceiling, devoid of any dome (Rötzer 2005: 53). At the next site, occupied by the present Aurangzeb mosque, only traces of Raja Todarmal’s temple, rebuilt around 1585 in Chunar sandstone less than 100 metres to the south of old Vishvanatha Temple, can be seen. The qibla wall rises above the plainly visible remains of the temple, which was not completely demolished ― in fact, merely crushed (cf. Figs. 8.1 and 8.2). 

It is not easy to establish the original appearance of the temple built by Raja Todar Mal and Narayana Bhatta under the support and patronage of Raja Man Singh, a chief courtier in Akbar’s court. As for the overall plan of the monument, we have James Prinsep’s hypothetical reconstruction published in 1833, partly based on the description of the deities worshipped there as imagined in the Kashi Khanda. Prinsep’s plan visualizes the temple as a mandala (cosmogram) of 3 by 3 square chambers, the central and larger one reserved for Vishveshvara (Fig. 8.2). 

The plan and architecture of Vishveshvara temple may be compared with the slightly earlier monument erected at the pilgrimage site of Brindavan on the Yamuna river by Raja Man Singh of Amber, another of Akbar’s Rajput military commanders. Dedicated to Govindadeva, the Brindavan temple of 1591 graphically demonstrates how Mughal building techniques were placed at the service of Hindu ritual requirements. Though its octagonal spired sanctuary was later demolished, a part of the temple still stands. This includes a mandapa of majestic proportions roofed with a dome raised more than 14 metres high on lofty pointed arches. Transepts leading to side porches with external colonnades give the temple an almost perfect cruciform layout. (The great Chaturbhuja Mandir at Orchha in central India erected by Bir Singh Bundela (r. 1592-1627) of Bundelkhand in the early 17th century presents a complete version of the Govindadeva scheme since its octagonal spired sanctuary is still intact). Bir Singh Bundela, a Rajput of eminence, had been a loyal supporter and friend of Emperor Jahangir from his tumultuous princely days. As Jahangir ascended the throne, Bir Singh was happily ensconced in his home state of Orchha in Bundelkhand at the north-western tip of Madhya Pradesh, and easily patronised and promoted the building of grand temples at important places (cf. Michell 2005). 

We would expect to find a similar arrangement of architectural features in Raja Todar Mal’s monument in Banaras, since both this and the Govindadeva Temple at Brindavan were almost contemporary projects. (The same may have also been true of the great Bindu Madhava Temple erected at the turn of the 17th century by Raja Man Singh above Panchaganga Ghat in Banaras) (Michell 2005: 81). It is also speculated that Bir Singh Bundela was the major source behind the construction of the Vishvanatha temple, most probably around 1623 in the regime of Jahangir! Unfortunately, there is no evidence to support it.  

During her reign Razia Sultana (1236-1240) had built a mosque on the deserted site of Vishvanatha temple, which had been earlier demolished by Aibak in ca 1194. By the end of the 13th century the Vishvanatha temple was re-built in the compound of Avimukteshvara and existed till the next destruction (of course partial) under the rule of the Sharqi kings of Jaunpur (1436-1458). But in 1490 Sikandar Lodi completely demolished it. Only after a gap of about ninety years, in ca 1585 with the support of Todar Mala, one of the senior courtiers of Akbar, the great scholar and writer Narayana Bhatta (1514-1595) had re-built it again, most likely on the structural plan of the previous temple of the 13th century. 

Fig. 8.1. Western part of the ancient Vishvanatha temple in the early 19th century (after James Prinsep, 1833; source: Singh, Rana P.B. 2009, and @ the authors).

Fig. 8.1. Western part of the ancient Vishvanatha temple in the early 19th century (after James Prinsep, 1833; source: Singh, Rana P.B. 2009, and @ the authors).

In 1669 even that temple of Vishvanatha was demolished by the order of the bigot Mughal emperor Aurangzeb, and today the Jnanavapi mosque stands on its site. As it would have been only a little additional trouble for Aurangzeb to order the demolition of the entire temple, one can only assume that the back portion was consciously spared as a warning and insult to the feelings of the city’s Hindu population (Michell 2005: 80). And, only a century later on 25 August 1777 by the patronage of Queen Ahilyabai Holkar of Indore, the present temple of Vishvanatha was completed (cf. Fig. 8.3, compare Fig. 8.4). Ahilyabai’s temple typifies the revivalist idiom that spread across north India during the course of the 18th century (Michell 2005: 81). The latter’s plan was made on the four-corner chambers and three central chambers that easily fit into the archetype of seven layers (cf. Fig. 8.4).

During late 18th century “building fabric is being gradually dismantled and replaces with speculative multi-storeyed apartment blocks; [here] the clientele is affluent retirees, seeking absolution as well as modern amenities in Kashi [Varanasi]” (Desai 2019, p. 75). Many shrines and temples have been built or re-constructed in the vicinity as a result of spatial transposition, and also several old ones revitalised under patronage of landlord and kings. Consequently, a mass of illegal encroachments and buildings grown up on the name of serving Vishvanatha, and within the house shrines were constructed and folk mythologies superimposed to raise the image under upward mobility.

In the main compound of Vishvanatha temple there are sacred sites of 33 divinities, mostly associated to Shiva and his associates (Fig. 8.5). Since late 18th century they are part of the rituals and auspicious vision (darshana) by the devotees.

Fig. 8.2. Varanasi: Ancient Vishveshvara temple plan (based on Prinsep 1833; after and @ the authors)

Fig. 8.2. Varanasi: Ancient Vishveshvara temple plan (based on Prinsep 1833; after and @ the authors)

Fig. 8.3. Changing historical sites of the Vishvanatha temple: (1) Unknown, before ca. 7th century CE (!), (2) ca. 7th century to 1194, (3) From 1594 to 1669, and (4) Since 25 August 1777 to the present (after and @ the authors).

Fig. 8.3. Changing historical sites of the Vishvanatha temple: (1) Unknown, before ca. 7th century CE (!), (2) ca. 7th century to 1194, (3) From 1594 to 1669, and (4) Since 25 August 1777 to the present (after and @ the authors).

Fig. 8.4. Vishvanatha Temple, architectural design of the front view. 1 Vishveshvara, 2 Vaikuntheshvara, 3 Dandapanishvara, 4 Virupakseshvara, 5 Vireshvara, 6 Adishakti (based on Prinsep 1833, after and @ the authors).

Fig. 8.4. Vishvanatha Temple, architectural design of the front view. 1 Vishveshvara, 2 Vaikuntheshvara, 3 Dandapanishvara, 4 Virupakseshvara, 5 Vireshvara, 6 Adishakti (based on Prinsep 1833, after and @ the authors).

Fig. 8.5. Vishvanatha Temple (Ahilyabai Holkar’s temple), area plan

Fig. 8.5. Vishvanatha Temple (Ahilyabai Holkar’s temple), area plan:

1 Vishveshvara, 2 Vaikuntheshvara, 3 Dandapanishvara, 4 Virupakseshvara, 5 Vireshvara, 6 Adishakti, 7 Shringara Gauri, 8 Kubereshvara, 9 Vedavyaseshvara, 10 bell (ghanta), donated from Nepal, 11 Annapurna (also identified as Saubhgya Gauri or Ahalyabai Holkar from Indore), 12 Ganesha, 13 Nikhumbheshvara, 14 platform with ca. 20 votive lingas, 15 Shitala (also identified as Annapurna or Savitri), 16 Shanaishchareshara and Bhimashankara among votive lingas, 17 Dandapani Vinayaka (also identified as Avimukta Vinayaka), 18 Mahalaksmi (also identified as Virupaksha Gauri), 19 Satyanarayana, 20 votive Vishvanatha, 21 Nandi, 22 platform with eight votive lingas, 23 Avimukteshvara, 24 Nakulishvara, 25 Draupadaditya, 26 Dandapani Bhairava, 27 Hanuman, 28 Vishnu, 29 Moda Vinayaka (top) and Pramoda Vinayaka (bottom), 30 Kapilamuni, 31 Durmukha Vinayaka, 32 Sumukha Vinayaka, 33 platform with ca. 35 votive lingas (based on Niels Gutschow 2005; (after and @ the authors)

3. Sustainability: upcoming future

By 19th century the whole area surrounding Vishvanatha temple became sanctuary of gods and godlings attached to Lord Shiva and his family, which to be broadly categorised into three groups, vis. historical-cultural old temples and shrines (including even some replicas) described in the Puraṇas dated up to ca 17th century, royal and patronised shrines and temples belonging to late 18th to 19th centuries and known for their architectural grandeur, and those built by private owners or priests and somehow added as part of the ancient glories (see Fig. 8.6).

Fig. 8.6. Vishvanatha Temple and environs, Varanasi: as existed till 2017 (after and @ the authors)

Fig. 8.6. Vishvanatha Temple and environs, Varanasi: as existed till 2017 (after and @ the authors)

Fig. 8.7. Vishvanatha Temple Territory, Varanasi: Development Plan in progress, 2020 (Source: Kashi Vishvanatha Tirtha Dham Project Report).

Fig. 8.7. Vishvanatha Temple Territory, Varanasi: Development Plan in progress, 2020 (Source: Kashi Vishvanatha Tirtha Dham Project Report).

From time to time, movements and confrontations were recorded to bring back the ancient glory and religious landscapes of Hindus, but could not succeeded mostly due to suppression in Mughal period and later in the British colonial rule who used policy of divide and rule by promoting confrontation between Muslims and Hindus. In fact, “these policies had wide-reaching implications, and accounts by mid-nineteenth-century Indian visitors, such as Jadunath Sarvadhikari, who visited the city in ca 1854, reveal an affinity for exclusionary identities based in religious polarization” (Desai 2019, p. 74). In Sarvadhikari’s view, the Jnanavapi precinct, along with other religious sites in Varanasi, had once belonged to “Hindus”, and therefore had to be wrested away from “Muslims”, with the support of the colonial government (Sarvadhikari 1915, p. 441). It is noted that immigration to Varanasi for religious and economic reasons has led to a marked heterodoxy of the city in general. It simultaneously provides a potential trigger for confrontation and at the same time, due to the sheer variety of backgrounds of the immigrants, a dilution of the potentially polarizing communal solidarities (see Dumper 2020).  

After destruction of mosque in Ayodhya on 6th December 1992, the temple of Vishvanatha has caught attention to get its surrounding area cleaned and re-establish its prominence in the religious arena. This is strongly supported under the ideology of Hindu nationalism and cultural diplomacy. In the same vein, like Ayodhya, the present government planned to develop the Vishvanatha temple territory (kshetra) as a special area with modern facilities and open spaces, after getting cleaned the narrow lanes and congested and haphazard settlements (see Fig. 8.7, compare Fig. 8.6). Through the ambitious plan of promoting heritage tourism by replacing pilgrimage-tourism, under cultural diplomacy, a mega project of worth cost Rs 6 billion (equals to US Dollar 770 million) has been started  with the approval of the state and the central governments on 8 March 2019, and projected as ‘dream project’ of the prime minister Narendra Modi under Smart City and Heritage Making programme. Under this project already 280 houses and shops were razed to ground, of course most of them rehabilitated but in a poor condition together with losing their identity, social interaction and cultural harmony. The vision refers that “the idea behind the project is similar to the ambitious redevelopment of many historical cities of the world like Paris [in the 19th century], where ghettos were removed”; however, it is completely neglected that the city and this area have been an unique image and personality of “spirituality and pilgrimage”— no way tourism as almost all the domestic visitors are pilgrims or devout Hindus. All these developments are structured to superimpose ‘heritagization’ through making a model of modernised Neo-Hinduism that will please to the western tourists and rich neo-liberal Hindus.  

Under the guidance of hon’ble Chief Minister Sri Adityanath Yogi, a plan for the revival of “Sacred Trail” (Pāvan Path) has been initiated on 24 October 2017, taking into consideration Vishvanatha Temple as the centre (axis mundi), and to revived and develop routes linking representative  12 Jyotir Lingas (Shiva), 09 Devis (Goddesses), 09 Gauris (‘White Goddesses’), 08 Vinayaka (Ganeshas), 08 Bhairava (Fierce-form Shiva), 12 Aditya (Surya, Sun-God). The cultural-historical (Pauranic) importance of these sacred sites will be enhanced and reflected by reviving, repairing and restructuring the pilgrimage paths, lightening, and cleaning, which will help to re-establish and make active the religious and spiritual tradition of these sacred sites and paths.

In 2018, for the development of Pavan Path plan, an area of 50ha has been allocated with a budget of Rs 600 crores. For all the administrative control and structural planning, a trust named Kashi Vishvanatha Tirtha Kshetra (KVTK) was formed on 8 March 2019 and was inaugurated by hon’ble PM Narendra Modi. It is expected that on the special festive day of Maha Shivaratri (the marriage day of Shiva), which falls on 1 March 2022, the whole complex will be finally opened for the public (see Fig. 8.8, also Fig. 8.9).

Fig. 8.8. Central part of Vishvanatha Temple Territory, Varanasi: Development Plan in progress, 2020 (Source: Kashi Vishvanatha Tirtha Dham Project Report).

Fig. 8.8. Central part of Vishvanatha Temple Territory, Varanasi: Development Plan in progress, 2020 (Source: Kashi Vishvanatha Tirtha Dham Project Report).

Fig. 8.9. Sketch of Vishvanatha Temple Kshetra: from the West to the East towards the Ganga River (with courtesy of Ar Sonali Jaiswal); (after and @ the authors).

Fig. 8.9. Sketch of Vishvanatha Temple Kshetra: from the West to the East towards the Ganga River (with courtesy of Ar Sonali Jaiswal); (after and @ the authors).

To get an areal expansion 280 houses in the neighbourhoods are purchased and demolished by the KVTK trust for the purpose of new sacred compound. The householders were rehabilitated and enough sale value of their house were handed over to them. This complex will be a model for sacred sanctuary, where will also be green belt consisting of sacred plants (like Rudraksha, holy basil) and flowering trees (parijata, juhi, chameli, etc.) and adjacent to these there will be small platform to sit and meditate. After completion, the Vishvanatha temple will directly be linked with wide and sacred path (‘pavan path’) to the riverfront Ganga River, close to Jalashayi (Jalasen) Ghat (see Fig. 8.9). The ancient image of having glimpse of Vishvanatha after holy dip in the Ganga River will be fulfilled, this revived the Ananda Kshetra, wherein one will receive the sublime bliss showered by Vishvanatha. The distorted and dilapidated images and sculptures will be re-established and made revived through the process of prana pratishtha (‘transferring the ethereal breath’).  

This mega project will promote pilgrimage-tourism, spiritual and cultural tourism, and resultantly promote economy and cultural development with a view to reviving the role of Sanathana Dharma (Hindu) in fostering global understanding. Moreover, this is expected to serve as model of imposing heritage planning of the sacredscape, while keep its essence, values and aesthetics, as revealed in ancient Indian thought: Satyam, Shivam, Sundaram (‘the Truth, the Goodness, and Beautiful’).

Basic Sources

Lannoy, Richard 2002. Benares: A World within a World. The Microcosm of Kashi Yesterday and Tomorrow. Indica Books, Varanasi. 

Singh, Pratibha 2004. SHiva-Kashi: Pauraṇic Paripekṣya aur Vartman Saṅdarbh (Shiva-Kashi: Pauraṇic Background and Present Context). Vishvavidyalaya Prakashan, Varanasi. [in Hindi].

Singh, Rana P.B. (eds.) 1993. Banaras (Varanasi). Cosmic Order, Sacred City, Hindu Traditions. Tara Book Agency, Varanasi. [an anthology of 20 essays].

Singh, Rana P.B. 2009a. Banaras: Making of India’s Heritage City. (Planet Earth & Cultural Understanding, Series Pub. 3). Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle u. Tyne U.K.

Singh, Rana P.B. 2009b. Banaras, India’s Heritage City: Geography, History, & Bibliography.     [including Bibliography of 1276 sources, Hindu Festivals, 2006-15]. Pilgrimage and Cosmology Series: 8. Indica Books, Varanasi.

Singh, Rana P.B. and Rana, Pravin S. 2002. Banaras Region. A Spiritual and Cultural Guide. Pilgrimage & Cosmology Series: 1. Indica Books, Varanasi. 2nd ed. 2006; pp. 161-174.  

Singh, Rana P.B. and Rana, Pravin S. 2021. Cultural Diplomacy in India: Dispersal, Heritage Representation, Contestation and Development. In: Olimpia Niglio and Eric Yong Joong Lee (eds.) Transcultural Heritage and International Law: Ethic, laws, and dialogue among cultures. Cultural Diplomacy & Heritage series. Springer Nature Pte Ltd. Singapore, Singapore: ca pp. 267-294 <Chapter 16>

Sukul, Kuberanath 1977 (Samvata 2034). Varanasī Vaibhava. (The Glory of Varanasi). Rastrabhasha Parishad, Patna. [in Hindi].

…………………………………………………….

Note: For all the sources/ references cited in the text, see Singh, 2009a: pp. 99-103.

crossmenuarrow-rightcross-circle linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram